OdomAgustin52

We're Listening To You] contains further concerning why to provide for it. At exactly the same time, there was a decline of about 228,000 production workers (23,000 per year) correlated with declines in industry output. In other words, even in a period of rapidly growing result, accompanied by a rise in employment for total manufacturing, there were many industries in which there was a fall in employment associated with decrease in unit man hours or, to a considerably lesser extent, with decreases in output. The association between changes in unit man hours and employment increases or decreases was scattered among many industries throughout manufacturing, so again there clearly was no special industrial routine to the disemployment amounts. Hence, we got two estimates of employment declines related to declines in unit man hours. The average yearly speed is nearly 200,000 for the interval 1953 59 and almost 90,000 for the interval 1947-57. It is generally anticipated that during the next decade the economy will grow at a faster pace than it has in the last few years, but that output per man hour may also increase more rapidly. In case the same expectancy is applied to manufacturing, it does not seem excessive that there'll be disemployment of at least 100,000 creation workers in that sector each year, on the average. An additional reduction may be anticipated in sectors where the drop in employment are more directly related to decreases in output. It's, nonetheless, an indication of the usefulness of various kinds of productivity measures for work force investigation..